Sequestration
will soon be a plan if not done so already for numerous of agencies and
departments within the U.S. for budget and debt issues through Congress. With United States fiscal cliff,
sequestration is a good place to start in cutting federal budget. However, it will cause many furloughs in
certain industries. With that being
said, the aviation industry will most likely be the 1st to get severely
sequestered.
According
to a USA Governemnt article, sequestration, sometimes called the sequester, is
a process that automatically cuts the federal budget across most departments
and agencies. Congress included the
threat of sequestration in the Budget Control Act of 2011 as a way to encourage
compromise on deficit reduction efforts.
"The President and Congress have had a year and a half to come up
with a smarter way to reduce spending, and they have failed" (Widom,
2013). With no solution in sight after
March 1st 2013, the U.S. is now stuck with sequestration, which is likely to
result in $85 billion in cuts over the next year alone, with reductions being
split equally between defense and domestic spending (USA.gov, 2013). In my opinion, I think that sequestration
should have taken place years ago so that we would not be in so much debt
crisis in today’s society. As Charles
Spence stated in his article, “FAA spending over the past few years has shown
several areas where belts could be tightened to prevent any cuts in more
important places. These include $179 million for FAA employee travel and $143
million a year to maintain a fleet of 46 aircraft. Thune and Shuster say the
FAA has $2.7 billion in non-personnel operations costs that should have been
examined before furloughs were even considered.”
While
cuts are being made progressively in certain industries, sequestration has
definitely become a plan for the the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
take advantage of for the aviation world. The FAA is planning for over $600
million in spending cuts for the 2013 fiscal year. The government agency will
not only be furloughing workers, but will also be reducing funding and closing
over 100 air traffic control facilities, eliminate the overnight shift for at
least 60 facilities, and reduce preventive maintenance and support for all air
traffic control equipment. The high standards of safety in the aviation
industry will also be affected (Matteson, 2013). This will not only affect the
efficiency of the aviation industry, but also the safety, aircraft operations
and maintenance. This will also include
aviation managers as well in which I am a bit concerned about due to being a
avaiation management graduate:
"The furloughs will include all management and non-management employees working within the Air Traffic Organization" (Matterson, 2013).
From
what I've gathered, I think the sequestration will not benefit the industries
including aviation. If the government stop wasting billions of dollars on unnecessary
needs, maybe the U.S. wouldn't be facing budgeting and furloughs in the U.S. It’s obvious that aviation will take a big
hit and that there will be a lot of disappointed employees losing their jobs
and that I now will have to be cautious on what organization, department, and facility
I choose to work in.
Sources:
Matteson,
C. (2013, March 9). How sequestration affects aviation
industry. Retrieved from:
http://voices.yahoo.com/how-sequestration-affects-aviation-industry-12040508.html
Spence,
C. (2013, March 2013). Some
question faa’s selection of sequestion cuts. Retrieved from: http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/03/some-question-faas-selection-of-sequestration-cuts/
Widom,
W. (2013, February 28). What is
Sequestration & Why Politicians Are a Bunch of Windbags. Retrieved from: http://www.chicagonow.com/families-in-the-loop/2013/02/what-is-sequestration-and-why-partisan-politics-is-wrong/
USA.gov. (2013, February 26). What is Sequestration? Retrieved from: http://blog.usa.gov/post/44071444149/what-is-sequestration
Ryan, I really like that you were able to find some of the spending numbers related to the FAA. There is no doubt that nearly every government agency has fat to trim, but the spending for FAA employee travel seems ridiculous. It occurs to me that what our government may need is a specialized financial team from the office of spending and budget that is tasked with continually auditing department program spending. It simply seems that people think “well, the feds are paying for it, so who cares?” Strangely, though many people seem to be well aware of the issue the same problems keep showing up. Where is the moral compass, what is up with that?
ReplyDeleteI agree that the government needs to spend billions of dollars less on stuff that cannot be justified. Because of this unnecessary spending (including spending in other countries), we now have this sequester with furloughed United States citizens. The FAA has a particular importance which is safety of pilots and passengers. Sounds like people should have thought about this beforehand.
ReplyDeleteThe numbers that you stated about FAA spending money on things that were not necessary are staggering. After hearing those numbers, I agree that cuts should have been made a while ago to stop unnecessary spending. The cuts that will take place now will affect safety and efficiency in the industry, which are two things that drive the industry. I agree the sequestration will not benefit the aviation industry at all, or any industry for that matter.
ReplyDeleteThank you for posting your blog. This has been very helpful to me, and if you're looking sell plane then contact High-Performance Aviation LLC!
ReplyDelete